So, what I've learned about the "Pluto: Planet or Not" issue from a very
interesting but somewhat painful series of exchanges with a number of
planetary scientists over the past couple of days:
1) Planetary scientists (at least this particular group) have no sense of humor whatsoever.
2) The Pluto "controversy", being very, very, VERY important to them,
is all about a "turf war" between different factions of the
International Astronomical Union. They're miffed because of political
wrangling within the IAU which allowed the Anti-Pluto gang to slip in
the vote after all the planetary types had departed for the airport,
thus installing a new definition for the word Planet in the "official"
rules of the astronomical nomenclature. Their point being that said
definition is imperfect. Must be nice to know what "perfect" is.
Considering that Planet is Ancient Greek for "Wanderer", which could
represent ANY celestial body which appears to move against the
background of stars, it seems to me that we might want to find a new
WORD rather than trying to squeeze the vast variety of types of worlds
into some re-definition of "Planet".
3) The actual impact of this
demotion of Clyde Tombaugh's 1930 discovery is nil. We've sent an
unmanned spacecraft zipping past Pluto (NASA's New Horizons probe 2015)
and continue to learn new things about this distant but dynamic world;
the New Horizons mission wasn't cancelled after the IAU decision with a
"feh, it's only a dwarf planet" news-release.
4) Given the number of
books, articles and videos that have been produced since this 2006 vote
in the IAU, I can only presume that a substantial number of researchers
have now built their careers (or at least financial side-lines) on this
"is/is not" argument, so we won't be seeing an end to this any time
soon.
5) In full knowledge that I'm about to bring the wrath
of an entire community of noisy scientists down upon my little, pointy,
scientifically-
illiterate
head, I propose that we stop beating this dead horse and move on. After
all, we call our ancestor on this planet Australopithecu
s
("Southern Man") because her fossil remains were first discovered in
the southern regions of Africa. Now that her bones have been found
throughout the continent that name is no longer "perfect", but the name
continues to be used.
6) Pluto
still doesn't CARE whether it's known to humans as a "planet" or "dwarf planet" or KBO or Plutoid.
Get over it, please.