United Airlines Boeing 767-300 (Stock Photo) |
24 June 2016
Sir or Madame,
I find myself compelled to
write regarding a recent travel experience with your airline. While not precisely a letter of complaint, I
hope to stress herein a few points on the subject of aircraft and passenger
safety while detailing both the positive and negative aspects of the narrative.
One initial point I would
like to make clear is that I am not an aviation professional but a 36-year
Sailor and Merchant Mariner; while not knowledgeable on the minutiae of
aircraft systems and procedures I am experienced enough to recognize
professional conduct by transportation personnel and the exercise of safe
practice in the event of unforeseen incidents.
On 19 June 2016, while
returning from U.S. Government business in Crete, I boarded Flight UA125 from
Athens to Newark NJ. Within twenty
minutes of departure the Captain made the announcement that there was a problem
with the 767-300's flaps (they were jammed in the retracted position) and that
the aircraft would be returning to Athens.
Upon completion of a partial fuel dump (which necessitated orbit over
the Aegean Sea) we recovered at Athens, landing at higher-than-normal speed to
compensate for the decreased flap capability of the aircraft. Landing was bumpy but not excessively so, and
within a few minutes all passengers were safely deplaned.
At this point I would like to
recognize the professional performance of the flight crew; Captain Constantino (I believe this was her
name--it is possible that my spelling is incorrect) and her team handled the
incident with skill, also keeping the passengers informed of our progress with
frequent informative and calming announcements.
Once on the ground the cabin crew especially distinguished themselves by
ably managing our exit from the aircraft.
After some delay at Athens
Airport the passengers of UA125 were put on buses and transported to the
Metropolitan Hotel in the city. There
adequate lodgings and meal service were provided despite the short notice
involved, and all involved were provided a pleasant environment to relax in
after the day's events.
On the following morning (20
June 2016) the passengers boarded the same aircraft; as I boarded I noted that
mechanics (wearing KLM jumpsuits) were working on the underside of the port
(left) wing on a hydraulic lift platform.
There was some delay while final inspections took place and paperwork
was signed (this announcement was made by the cabin crew), and finally we took
off on our interrupted flight to Newark.
Unfortunately the 767's flaps
were not properly repaired after all; immediately after takeoff the
air-crew found that they could not retract the extended control surfaces. For the second time, after dumping fuel we
recovered at Athens Airport to meet the familiar escort of emergency vehicles
flashing red lights, deplaned and waited for buses to carry the passengers back
to the Metropolitan.
Again, kudos to Captain Constantino
and her fine crew; they handled this near-clone of our previous emergency very
well. Unfortunately I cannot say the
same for several members of the passenger contingent. General frustration and anger were quite
evident amongst my companions and in three cases that I am aware of verbal
abuse was directed at the cabin crew and even the Captain when she walked aft
to talk to us. One passenger that I know
of was escorted from the aircraft by Greek police; this man had apparently
directed verbal threats at the Captain.
Captain Constantino deals with dissent in the ranks |
Finally, on the morning of 21
June, a new aircraft was delivered from Chicago; Captain Constantino and her
team took charge of this airliner and the remaining passengers of our group
boarded and departed Athens that morning.
This particular flight went off flawlessly and ten hours later we were
deplaning in Newark.
Now, for my critique on a
safety issue. On 20 June it was obvious
to boarding passengers that the mechanics were still working on the left wing
of our 767-300, and our departure was delayed further while paperwork was
completed and signed. The subsequent
flap failure and our return to Athens make clear to me that there was no
attempt to confirm the success of repairs before embarking passengers and
taking off. This failure to complete a
"check flight" to verify the status of the aircraft as adequate for a
transcontinental flight was, in my opinion, a significant error.
Had the aircraft been flown without
passengers--with a fuel load sufficient to that purpose--prior to our coming
back aboard, it seems clear that this would have negated the possibility of
risking the safety of 200+ passengers AND of dumping a second long-range
load of fuel into the Aegean Sea. Surely
United spent more money on that wasted av-gas than it would have spent on a
quick check-flight, and I for one would not have objected to an additional
delay of a few hours while this seemingly obvious test was performed.
Thus, my single complaint to
register on the subject of this three-day tale is that, effectively, the
airline saw fit to risk the safety of 200+ persons (including myself) on an
un-tested aircraft on 20 June 2016. As a
transportation professional I find this unacceptable; it amounts to the use of
passengers as experimental "guinea pigs".
This completes my account of
the events of 19-21 June 2016 in the environs of Athens, Greece; of course this
represents a passenger's eye view and I do not claim to have all details. I welcome any feedback you might offer in
reference to my complaint, and look forward to your response to my concerns.
Thank You,
Thomas L. Epps
No comments:
Post a Comment